SOC 2 vs ISO 27001: Which One Do You Need?
This is the most common question we get: "Should we do SOC 2 or ISO 27001?"
The short answer for most SaaS companies: Start with SOC 2.
Here's why, and when ISO 27001 might be the better choice.
Key Takeaways
| Point | Summary |
|---|---|
| For SaaS companies | Start with SOC 2 - it's designed specifically for cloud services |
| ~70% overlap | Typically for SaaS companies, most controls are shared between frameworks, making the second one easier |
| Key difference | SOC 2 focuses on technical controls; ISO 27001 focuses on organizational processes |
| Timeline | SOC 2: 4.5-6 months; ISO 27001: 3-4 months |
| Get both | If you need both, start with SOC 2 then add ISO 27001 (€15-23K total) |
Quick Answer: Start with SOC 2 if you're a SaaS company. SOC 2 focuses on technical controls (many providers bundle penetration testing though it's not required by AICPA). Add ISO 27001 later when specific customers require it (~70% of the work is already done).
The Fundamental Difference
| SOC 2 | ISO 27001 | |
|---|---|---|
| Designed for | SaaS companies, cloud services | Any organization |
| Focus | Technical security, data protection in the cloud | Organizational processes, documentation |
| Includes pen test | No (commonly bundled by providers, not required by AICPA) | No |
| Output | Audit report | Certificate |
| Timeline | 4.5-6 months | 3-4 months |
| Annual effort after Year 1 | Same process annually | Surveillance audits (less intense) |
| Best for | US/North American clients, SaaS B2B | EU/APAC clients, public sector, regulated industries |
*Timelines vary based on company size, complexity, and initial security readiness.
SOC 2 is specifically designed for SaaS. It covers how you manage data in the cloud - data security, service availability, IP confidentiality.
ISO 27001 is more generic. A law firm can be ISO 27001 certified. A consulting company can be certified. It predates modern cloud computing and focuses heavily on organizational processes.
Why We Recommend SOC 2 for SaaS Companies
For most SaaS companies, SOC 2 provides more security value:
Stronger technical controls: SOC 2 goes deeper on application security, technical implementation, and cloud infrastructure
Penetration testing often bundled: While not required by AICPA, most SOC 2 service providers bundle penetration testing as good practice. Many enterprise clients expect it regardless of the framework. (Note: Penetration testing is not an AICPA Trust Services Criteria requirement for SOC 2.)
SaaS-specific framework: SOC 2 was designed for "how do you secure data and services in the cloud" - exactly what your customers care about
The ISO 27001 Documentation Reality
Here's what founders don't expect about ISO 27001: It's extremely documentation-heavy.
| Aspect | SOC 2 | ISO 27001 |
|---|---|---|
| Policies written | 20-25 documents | 30-35 documents |
| Documentation focus | Technical controls | Organizational processes |
| What auditors review | Whether controls work | Whether processes are documented and followed |
| Common feedback | "We improved security" | "We signed a lot of documents" |
ISO 27001 is more about process and governance. At the end, you won't necessarily say "this changed how we work" - you'll say "we documented everything and signed a lot of policies."
For engineering teams, this feels less valuable than SOC 2's technical focus.
~70% Overlap Between Frameworks
Good news: Typically for SaaS companies, there's approximately 70% overlap between SOC 2 and ISO 27001 controls.
| Shared Controls | SOC 2 | ISO 27001 |
|---|---|---|
| Access Control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Change Management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Incident Response | ✓ | ✓ |
| Risk Management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vendor Management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Encryption | ✓ | ✓ |
| Monitoring | ✓ | ✓ |
If you complete SOC 2 first, getting ISO 27001 mainly requires:
- Additional process documentation
- Internal audit (ISO-specific requirement)
- Management review (ISO-specific requirement)
- Statement of Applicability
The hard technical work is already done.
Real Timeline Comparison
| Phase | SOC 2 | ISO 27001 |
|---|---|---|
| Implementation | 6-8 weeks | 4-6 weeks |
| Audit period | 3 months (observation) | 1-2 months |
| Report/Certificate | 2-3 weeks | 2-3 weeks |
| Total | 4.5-6 months | 3-4 months |
*Timelines vary based on company size, complexity, and initial security readiness.
ISO 27001 is faster because it doesn't require the 3-month observation period that SOC 2 Type 2 demands.
However, ISO 27001 has a 3-year certification cycle:
- Year 1: Initial certification
- Years 2-3: Surveillance audits (shorter, less intense)
- Year 4: Full recertification
SOC 2 requires annual recertification (same process each year).
Real Cost Comparison
| Scenario | Typical Investment |
|---|---|
| SOC 2 only | €10,000-50,000 Year 1 |
| ISO 27001 only | €10,000-50,000 Year 1 |
| Both frameworks | €15,000-60,000 Year 1 |
The investment for either framework depends on your organization's size, scope, and technical complexity. The key point: pursuing both frameworks doesn't mean doubling your costs, because typically for SaaS companies, approximately 70% of the work is shared.
When to Choose ISO 27001 Instead
Choose ISO 27001 when:
| Scenario | Why ISO |
|---|---|
| Public sector clients | Government often requires ISO specifically |
| French/EU enterprise clients | ISO has higher "marketing value" in Europe |
| Highly regulated industries | Banks, insurance may specifically require ISO |
| Competitor parity | If all competitors have ISO, you need it too |
| HDS requirements | Health Data Hosting in France builds on ISO |
| You don't need pen test | If clients truly don't care about technical testing |
That said, even in Europe, sophisticated buyers increasingly see SOC 2 because they buy American software. They're used to reviewing SOC 2 reports alongside ISO certificates.
When to Get Both
Get both SOC 2 and ISO 27001 when:
- Customers explicitly require both: Some enterprise clients check off both boxes
- Security is a competitive feature: In security-conscious industries, having both sends a strong signal
- You're global: US customers expect SOC 2, European customers may prefer ISO
- Banking/finance clients: One is good, both is "way fewer questions"
If you're getting both, start with SOC 2 and add ISO 27001 after.
The "ISO 27001 + No Pen Test" Problem
Here's what we frequently see with ISO-only:
Month 1-3: Complete ISO 27001
Month 4: Client sends security questionnaire
Question 47: "When was your last penetration test?"
Answer: "We don't have one"
Client: "Please provide pen test report within 30 days"
This is why SOC 2 (with proper scope including pen test) often covers more of what clients actually ask for, even if they said "just ISO 27001."
The pen test question appears in 70-80% of security questionnaires, regardless of which certification you have.
Both Recognized in Europe
A common misconception: "SOC 2 is American, so European clients won't accept it."
Reality: European companies buy a lot of American software. Every European enterprise has reviewed SOC 2 reports from US vendors. They know the framework well.
In practice, you can swap SOC 2 and ISO 27001 interchangeably for most European clients. The exception is public sector, which often specifically mandates ISO.
The Decision Framework
Start with SOC 2 if:
- You're a SaaS company
- You sell primarily to tech-savvy buyers
- Your customers will ask for pen test anyway
- You want stronger technical security validation
- You're not sure which to choose (default to SOC 2)
Start with ISO 27001 if:
- A specific customer explicitly requires ISO (and confirmed they won't accept SOC 2)
- You're targeting public sector
- You're in a heavily regulated industry where ISO is standard
- You want the "marketing value" of an ISO certificate in Europe
- You genuinely don't need pen testing (rare)
Get both if:
- Different customer segments require different frameworks
- You're expanding globally (US + EU)
- Security is a key competitive differentiator
- You have budget for a comprehensive compliance program
How Adding a Second Framework Works
If you have SOC 2, adding ISO 27001:
- Additional investment: Reduced compared to standalone, since core controls are in place (see ISO 27001 certification cost)
- Additional work: Documentation, internal audit, management review
- Timeline: 3-4 months (see how long ISO 27001 takes)
- Technical work: Already done
If you have ISO 27001, adding SOC 2:
- Additional investment: Reduced compared to standalone (see SOC 2 costs)
- Additional work: Penetration testing, 3-month observation
- Timeline: 4.5-6 months (see how long SOC 2 takes)
- Key addition: The pen test and observation period
This is why starting with SOC 2 is often more efficient. ISO becomes a straightforward add-on since the technical foundation is already in place.
What Happens If You Drop ISO 27001
ISO certifications are tracked in public registries (IAF - International Accreditation Forum). If you get certified and then drop it:
- Your dropped certification appears in public registry
- Clients can see you "lost" your certification
- You'll need to explain why (never a good conversation)
SOC 2 reports simply expire without public record. There's no registry showing you "used to have SOC 2."
This means: Only start ISO 27001 if you're committed to maintaining it long-term.
Our Recommendation
For most SaaS companies targeting startups/scaleups:
- Get SOC 2 first (4.5-6 months)
- Add ISO 27001 when needed (+3-4 months)
- Maintain both with unified compliance program (shared controls, shared evidence)
Don't pursue ISO 27001 "just because." Get it when specific customers require it.
And definitely don't do ISO 27001 without a pen test and expect enterprise security questionnaires to go smoothly. They won't.
Not sure which framework fits your customer base? Talk to our team - we'll help you figure out what your specific customers actually need.
Sources
- AICPA Trust Services Criteria - Official TSC framework defining SOC 2 control objectives
- AICPA SOC Suite of Services - Overview of SOC 2 attestation engagements
- ISO/IEC 27001 Standard - International standard for information security management systems
