SOC 1 vs SOC 2 vs SOC 3: Complete Comparison Guide
The "SOC" family of reports can be confusing. This guide explains the differences between SOC 1, SOC 2, and SOC 3, helping you understand which report your organization needs.
Key Takeaways
| Point | Summary |
|---|---|
| SOC 1 | For companies that affect client financial statements (payroll, payment processors) |
| SOC 2 | For SaaS and cloud services - evaluates security and operational controls |
| SOC 3 | Public summary of SOC 2 for marketing - requires completing SOC 2 first |
| Most tech companies | Need SOC 2, not SOC 1 |
| SOC 3 is not a shortcut | You must complete a full SOC 2 Type II audit before getting SOC 3 |
Quick Answer: If you're a SaaS or cloud company, you need SOC 2. SOC 1 is for financial processors. SOC 3 is a public marketing version of SOC 2 (requires SOC 2 first).
Quick Overview
| Report | Purpose | Audience | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| SOC 1 | Financial reporting controls | Auditors, finance teams | Companies affecting client financial statements |
| SOC 2 | Security and operational controls | Customers, prospects | SaaS, cloud services, data processors |
| SOC 3 | General security posture | General public | Marketing, public trust |
SOC 1: Financial Reporting Focus
What is SOC 1?
SOC 1 (formerly SSAE 16, SAS 70) evaluates controls relevant to user entities' financial reporting. It's designed for service organizations whose services impact their clients' financial statements.
Who Needs SOC 1?
- Payroll processors
- Claims processors
- Payment processors
- Financial data centers
- Loan servicing companies
- Trust companies
- Benefits administrators
SOC 1 Framework
SOC 1 reports are based on control objectives that you define, specific to your service and its impact on clients' financial reporting.
Key characteristics:
- Control objectives defined by service organization
- Tests whether controls achieve those objectives
- Focused on financial data accuracy and completeness
- Used by financial auditors of client companies
SOC 1 Types
| Type | Coverage | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Type I | Control design at a point in time | Initial assessment |
| Type II | Control effectiveness over a period | Ongoing assurance |
When SOC 1 is Required
Your clients' auditors may require SOC 1 when:
- You process financial transactions on their behalf
- Your services affect their financial statement assertions
- They need to rely on your controls for their own audit
SOC 2: Security and Operations Focus
What is SOC 2?
SOC 2 evaluates controls based on the Trust Services Criteria: Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy. It's designed for technology and cloud service providers.
Who Needs SOC 2?
- SaaS companies
- Cloud service providers
- Data centers
- Managed service providers
- IT service companies
- Any company handling customer data
SOC 2 Framework
SOC 2 reports are based on the AICPA's Trust Services Criteria:
| Criterion | Focus |
|---|---|
| Security (Required) | Protection against unauthorized access |
| Availability | System uptime and accessibility |
| Processing Integrity | Complete, accurate processing |
| Confidentiality | Protection of confidential information |
| Privacy | Personal information handling |
SOC 2 Types
| Type | Coverage | Typical Use |
|---|---|---|
| Type I | Control design at a point in time | Quick compliance credential |
| Type II | Control effectiveness over 3-12 months | Enterprise customer requirement |
When SOC 2 is Required
Customers require SOC 2 when:
- Evaluating your security practices
- Assessing vendor risk
- Meeting their own compliance requirements
- Making purchasing decisions
SOC 3: Public Trust Report
What is SOC 3?
SOC 3 is a general-use report based on the same Trust Services Criteria as SOC 2, but designed for public distribution. It's essentially a summary version of SOC 2.
Key Differences from SOC 2
| Aspect | SOC 2 | SOC 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Distribution | Restricted (NDA required) | Public |
| Detail Level | Comprehensive (~100+ pages) | Summary (~10 pages) |
| Control Details | Describes specific controls | High-level overview only |
| Test Results | Detailed test results | Pass/fail summary |
| Use | Customer due diligence | Marketing, public trust |
Who Needs SOC 3?
Organizations that want to:
- Publicly demonstrate security commitment
- Use compliance for marketing
- Provide assurance without NDA requirements
- Display a "seal" on their website
SOC 3 Requirements
To get a SOC 3 report, you must:
- Complete a SOC 2 Type 2 audit
- Receive an unqualified opinion from your auditor
- Request the SOC 3 version from your auditor
Understanding "Unqualified Opinion" vs "No Exceptions":
These terms are often confused but mean different things:
- Unqualified opinion: The auditor's overall conclusion that controls were suitably designed and operating effectively. This is the standard "passing" opinion.
- Exceptions: Specific instances where a control didn't operate as intended during testing (e.g., an access review was missed one month).
An auditor can issue an unqualified opinion even when some exceptions exist, provided those exceptions are minor and don't undermine the overall effectiveness of your control environment. The opinion reflects the auditor's professional judgment about your controls as a whole—not a requirement for perfection.
Important: SOC 3 is not a shortcut. It requires completing the full SOC 2 audit first.
Detailed Comparison
Purpose and Focus
| Report | Primary Purpose | Control Focus |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 1 | Support financial audits | Financial reporting |
| SOC 2 | Demonstrate security practices | Security and operations |
| SOC 3 | Public trust building | Security (summarized) |
Report Contents
| Section | SOC 1 | SOC 2 | SOC 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Auditor's Opinion | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| System Description | ✓ | ✓ | Brief |
| Control Objectives | Custom defined | Trust Services Criteria | Trust Services Criteria |
| Control Activities | Detailed | Detailed | Not included |
| Test Results | Detailed | Detailed | Summary only |
| Management Assertion | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Distribution and Use
| Aspect | SOC 1 | SOC 2 | SOC 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Distribution | Restricted | Restricted | Public |
| NDA Required | Yes | Yes | No |
| Can share publicly | No | No | Yes |
| Marketing use | No | Limited | Yes |
| Website seal | No | No | Yes |
Typical Audiences
| Audience | SOC 1 | SOC 2 | SOC 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Client's External Auditors | Primary | Secondary | Rarely |
| Prospective Customers | Rarely | Primary | Secondary |
| Existing Customers | Sometimes | Primary | Secondary |
| General Public | No | No | Primary |
| Regulators | Sometimes | Sometimes | Rarely |
Cost Comparison
| Report | Type I Cost | Type II Cost |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 1 | $15K - $40K | $25K - $60K |
| SOC 2 | $12K - $30K | $20K - $50K |
| SOC 3 | N/A | +$3K - $8K (addon to SOC 2) |
Note: SOC 3 is always an add-on to SOC 2 Type II, not standalone.
Decision Guide
You Need SOC 1 If:
- You process financial transactions for clients
- Your services impact client financial statements
- Client auditors request SOC 1 reports
- You're in payroll, claims, or payment processing
- Financial data accuracy is your primary value
You Need SOC 2 If:
- You're a SaaS or cloud service provider
- You store or process customer data
- Customers ask about your security practices
- You're selling to enterprises
- Security is a key buying criterion
You Need SOC 3 If:
- You already have SOC 2 Type II
- You want to publicly showcase compliance
- Marketing wants a security credential
- You want a seal for your website
- Customers want quick assurance without NDA
You Might Need Both SOC 1 and SOC 2 If:
- You process financial data AND other customer data
- Some customers request SOC 1, others request SOC 2
- You serve both financial auditors and security teams
Common Scenarios
Scenario 1: SaaS Company
Situation: B2B software company serving enterprise customers
Recommendation: SOC 2
Why: Customers care about security of their data, not financial reporting controls
Scenario 2: Payroll Provider
Situation: Payroll processing for businesses
Recommendation: SOC 1 + possibly SOC 2
Why:
- SOC 1: Payroll affects client financial statements
- SOC 2: May be requested by security-conscious customers
Scenario 3: Cloud Infrastructure Provider
Situation: IaaS/PaaS provider
Recommendation: SOC 2 + SOC 3
Why:
- SOC 2: Customer security due diligence
- SOC 3: Public trust and marketing
Scenario 4: Healthcare Software
Situation: Software handling patient data
Recommendation: SOC 2 (with Privacy criterion)
Why: Focus on data security and privacy, not financial reporting
Scenario 5: Financial Data Analytics
Situation: Platform analyzing financial data for clients
Recommendation: Potentially both SOC 1 and SOC 2
Why:
- SOC 1: Analytics may affect client financial reporting
- SOC 2: Security of the data being analyzed
Pursuing Multiple SOC Reports
SOC 1 + SOC 2 Together
If you need both:
Overlapping areas:
- Access controls
- Change management
- Monitoring
- Vendor management
Different focus:
- SOC 1: Financial reporting accuracy
- SOC 2: Security and operational controls
Approach:
- Unified gap assessment
- Implement shared controls once
- Add SOC 1-specific financial controls
- Add SOC 2-specific security controls
- Coordinate audits (same or different auditors)
SOC 2 + SOC 3 Together
SOC 3 is derived from SOC 2, so:
- Complete SOC 2 Type II audit
- Receive an unqualified opinion (minor exceptions are acceptable)
- Request SOC 3 report from auditor (small additional fee)
- Use SOC 3 for public/marketing purposes
Frequently Asked Questions
"Can I skip SOC 2 and just get SOC 3?"
No. SOC 3 requires completing a full SOC 2 Type II audit first. It's a summary of SOC 2, not a shortcut.
"Do I need both SOC 1 and SOC 2?"
Maybe. It depends on your services. If you affect client financial statements AND handle sensitive data, you may need both. Most technology companies only need SOC 2.
"Which SOC report do enterprises usually request?"
SOC 2. For technology and SaaS purchases, SOC 2 is the standard request. SOC 1 is typically only requested when financial auditors are involved.
"Is SOC 3 enough for enterprise sales?"
Usually not. Enterprises typically want the detailed SOC 2 report. SOC 3 is good for general marketing but doesn't satisfy enterprise due diligence requirements.
"Can I use the same auditor for SOC 1 and SOC 2?"
Yes. Many CPA firms perform both. Using the same auditor can provide efficiencies, though you can also use different auditors if preferred.
Summary Table
| Question | SOC 1 | SOC 2 | SOC 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Do I affect client financials? | ✓ | ||
| Do I handle customer data? | ✓ | ||
| Do customers ask about security? | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Do I want public marketing use? | ✓ | ||
| Am I a SaaS/cloud company? | ✓ | ||
| Am I a financial processor? | ✓ | Sometimes |
Not sure which SOC report you need? Talk to our experts →
Sources
- AICPA SOC Suite of Services - Official overview of SOC 1, SOC 2, and SOC 3 reports
- AICPA SOC 2® Guide - Detailed guidance for SOC 2 and SOC 3 engagements
- AICPA Trust Services Criteria - Framework for SOC 2 and SOC 3 evaluations
