NIS 2 vs GDPR: Understanding the Overlap
NIS 2 and GDPR are two of the most significant EU regulations affecting organizations' security and data practices. While NIS 2 focuses on cybersecurity of network and information systems and GDPR focuses on personal data protection, they share common ground and organizations subject to both must understand how to coordinate their compliance efforts.
Key Takeaways
| Point | Summary |
|---|---|
| Different focus | NIS 2 addresses cybersecurity; GDPR addresses data privacy and protection |
| Overlapping areas | Incident reporting, risk management, security measures, and organizational governance |
| Different scope triggers | NIS 2: sector + size; GDPR: processing of EU personal data |
| Complementary enforcement | A single incident may trigger obligations under both regulations |
| Coordinated approach | Organizations should integrate NIS 2 and GDPR compliance programs |
Quick Answer: NIS 2 and GDPR serve different purposes but overlap significantly in areas like incident reporting, security measures, and risk management. Most organizations subject to NIS 2 will also be subject to GDPR. A coordinated compliance approach avoids duplication and ensures all obligations are met.
Fundamental Differences
| Aspect | NIS 2 | GDPR |
|---|---|---|
| Primary objective | Cybersecurity of network and information systems | Protection of personal data |
| Type | Directive (transposed into national law) | Regulation (directly applicable) |
| Scope trigger | Sector classification + size threshold | Processing of EU residents' personal data |
| Maximum penalty | 10M / 2% global turnover (essential) | 20M / 4% global turnover |
| Supervisory authority | National cybersecurity authority / CSIRT | National data protection authority |
| Incident reporting | 24h early warning, 72h notification, 1 month final | 72 hours to supervisory authority |
| Focus of measures | Cybersecurity risk management | Data protection by design and by default |
Where They Overlap
Incident Reporting
Both regulations require incident reporting, but with different triggers and timelines:
| Aspect | NIS 2 | GDPR |
|---|---|---|
| What triggers reporting | Significant cybersecurity incident | Personal data breach |
| Initial deadline | 24 hours (early warning) | 72 hours |
| To whom | CSIRT / competent authority | Data protection authority |
| Final report | 1 month | Not specified (but must document) |
| Data subject notification | Not required | Required if high risk to individuals |
Overlap scenario: A ransomware attack that encrypts systems containing personal data triggers both NIS 2 incident reporting (cybersecurity incident) and GDPR breach notification (personal data breach). Organizations must report to both their CSIRT/competent authority and their data protection authority within their respective timelines.
Security Measures
Both require organizations to implement appropriate security measures:
| Security Area | NIS 2 (Article 21) | GDPR (Article 32) |
|---|---|---|
| Risk assessment | Mandatory, all-hazards approach | Mandatory, data-specific |
| Encryption | Policies on cryptography | Encryption of personal data |
| Access control | Required | Required |
| Incident response | Detection, response, recovery | Ability to restore data access |
| Testing | Effectiveness assessments | Regular testing of measures |
| Business continuity | Required | Resilience of processing systems |
Governance and Accountability
| Aspect | NIS 2 | GDPR |
|---|---|---|
| Management responsibility | Management body approval and oversight | Controller/processor accountability |
| Personal liability | Management can be personally liable | DPO role, but less personal liability |
| Training | Management and employee training required | Staff training recommended |
| Documentation | Comprehensive documentation required | Records of processing activities required |
When Both Apply
For most organizations, if NIS 2 applies, GDPR almost certainly applies too. Consider these scenarios:
Healthcare provider: Subject to NIS 2 as a health sector essential entity, and subject to GDPR for processing patient data.
Cloud service provider: Subject to NIS 2 as digital infrastructure, and subject to GDPR as a data processor for customers' personal data.
Energy company: Subject to NIS 2 as an essential entity in the energy sector, and subject to GDPR for processing employee and customer personal data.
Manufacturing company: Subject to NIS 2 as an important entity (if making medical devices, electronics, etc.), and subject to GDPR for processing employee, customer, and potentially consumer data.
Coordinating Compliance
Integrated Risk Assessment
Rather than conducting separate risk assessments for NIS 2 and GDPR, combine them:
- Include personal data processing risks in your NIS 2 risk assessment
- Ensure your data protection impact assessments (DPIAs) consider cybersecurity threats
- Map overlapping controls and avoid duplication
Unified Incident Response
Create an incident response process that addresses both frameworks:
- Detection and classification should identify whether an incident involves personal data (GDPR) and/or cybersecurity impact (NIS 2)
- Ensure your reporting procedures cover both CSIRT notification (24h under NIS 2) and DPA notification (72h under GDPR)
- Include data subject notification in your process when required by GDPR
- Maintain a single incident log with fields that satisfy both frameworks' documentation requirements
Shared Security Measures
Implement security measures that satisfy both frameworks simultaneously:
- Encryption policies (NIS 2 Article 21 + GDPR Article 32)
- Access control and authentication (both frameworks)
- Vulnerability management (both frameworks)
- Training programs covering both cybersecurity awareness and data protection
Governance Integration
- Include both cybersecurity and data protection in management briefings
- Coordinate between CISO (or NIS 2 responsible person) and DPO roles
- Ensure policies address both cybersecurity and data protection dimensions
Penalty Stacking
A significant concern is that a single incident could trigger penalties under both frameworks. For example:
- A data breach resulting from a cybersecurity failure could lead to NIS 2 enforcement (failure to implement adequate cybersecurity measures) and GDPR enforcement (failure to protect personal data)
- NIS 2 penalties (up to 10M/2% turnover) and GDPR penalties (up to 20M/4% turnover) are assessed independently
- Different authorities may investigate the same incident from their respective perspectives
NIS 2 addresses this partially by requiring cooperation between cybersecurity and data protection authorities, and stating that when a competent authority under NIS 2 identifies a potential GDPR violation during supervision, it should inform the relevant data protection authority.
Common Questions
Do we need separate compliance programs for NIS 2 and GDPR?
No, and having separate programs would be inefficient. The most effective approach is an integrated compliance framework that addresses both cybersecurity (NIS 2) and data protection (GDPR) requirements. Shared processes for risk assessment, incident response, and security measures reduce duplication and ensure consistency.
If we are GDPR compliant, how much additional work is NIS 2?
GDPR compliance provides a foundation, particularly in areas like risk assessment and security measures. However, NIS 2 adds substantial requirements around incident reporting (the 24-hour early warning is more stringent than GDPR's 72-hour deadline), management liability, supply chain security, and business continuity. Plan for significant additional work beyond GDPR compliance.
Do we report the same incident to both authorities?
Potentially, yes. If a cybersecurity incident also involves a personal data breach, you must report to both your CSIRT/competent authority (under NIS 2) and your data protection authority (under GDPR). The timelines differ (24h for NIS 2 early warning vs. 72h for GDPR), so the NIS 2 notification typically comes first.
