CCPA6 min read

CCPA and Other State Privacy Laws: Multi-State Compliance

California's CCPA was the first comprehensive state privacy law in the United States, but other states have followed. Understanding the relationship between CCPA and other state laws helps organizations build efficient, multi-state compliance programs.

Key Takeaways

Point Summary
Leading states Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, Utah, and others have enacted privacy laws
Common elements Consumer rights, opt-out, service provider contracts
Key differences Thresholds, consent requirements, enforcement
CCPA influence Most state laws follow CCPA model with variations
Compliance strategy Consider unified approach leveraging CCPA compliance

Quick Answer: Since CCPA, 15+ states have enacted comprehensive privacy laws with similar consumer rights but varying thresholds and requirements. A CCPA-compliant program provides a strong foundation for multi-state compliance, but state-specific adjustments are needed.

States with Comprehensive Privacy Laws

Enacted Laws (as of 2025)

State Law Effective Date
California CCPA/CPRA Jan 2020 / Jan 2023
Virginia VCDPA Jan 2023
Colorado CPA July 2023
Connecticut CTDPA July 2023
Utah UCPA Dec 2023
Iowa ICDPA Jan 2025
Indiana IDPA Jan 2026
Tennessee TIPA July 2025
Montana MCDPA Oct 2024
Texas TDPSA July 2024
Oregon OCPA July 2024
Delaware DPDPA Jan 2025
New Jersey NJDPA Jan 2025
New Hampshire NHDPA Jan 2025
Maryland MODPA Oct 2025

Applicability Thresholds Comparison

State Revenue Data Volume Data Revenue
California $26.625M 100,000 consumers 50%+ from data sales
Virginia None 100,000 consumers OR 50% revenue + 25,000 consumers N/A
Colorado None 100,000 consumers OR 25,000 consumers + revenue N/A
Connecticut None 100,000 consumers OR 25,000 consumers + revenue N/A
Utah $25M 100,000 consumers 50%+ from data sales
Texas None Conducts business in Texas and processes/sells PI N/A
Oregon None 100,000 consumers OR 25,000 consumers + 25% revenue N/A

Consumer Rights Comparison

Right CCPA VA CO CT UT TX
Access/Know Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Delete Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Correct Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Portability Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Opt-out (sale) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Opt-out (targeted ads) Yes* Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Opt-out (profiling) Limited Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Appeal No Yes Yes Yes No Yes

*CCPA covers "sharing" for cross-context behavioral advertising

Key Differences from CCPA

Consent Models

State Approach
California Opt-out for sale/sharing; opt-in for minors
Virginia Opt-out; opt-in for sensitive data processing
Colorado Opt-out; opt-in for sensitive data processing
Connecticut Opt-out; opt-in for sensitive data processing
Utah Opt-out only
Texas Opt-out for sale/targeted ads/profiling

Sensitive Data Treatment

State Approach
California Consumer can limit use; collection permitted
Virginia Opt-in consent required for processing
Colorado Opt-in consent required for processing
Connecticut Opt-in consent required for processing
Utah No special category; opt-out model
Texas Opt-in consent required for processing

Private Right of Action

State Private Lawsuit Allowed?
California Yes (data breaches only)
Virginia No
Colorado No
Connecticut No
Utah No
Texas No

CCPA is unique in allowing consumers to sue directly for data breaches.

Cure Periods

State Cure Period Notes
California 30 days For regulatory violations
Virginia 30 days Sunset January 2025 (no longer available)
Colorado 60 days Sunset January 2025 (no longer available)
Connecticut 60 days Sunset January 2025 (no longer available)
Utah 30 days Ongoing
Texas 30 days Ongoing

Enforcement

State Enforcer Maximum Penalty
California AG + CPPA $7,988 per violation
Virginia AG $7,500 per violation
Colorado AG $20,000 per violation
Connecticut AG $5,000 per violation
Utah AG $7,500 per violation
Texas AG $7,500 per violation

Data Processing Contracts

Common Requirements

All state laws require written contracts with processors including:

Requirement Universal?
Purpose specification Yes
Confidentiality Yes
Subcontractor requirements Yes
Audit rights Most states
Deletion at termination Yes
Demonstration of compliance Most states

CCPA-Specific Terms

Requirement CCPA Other States
Sale/sharing prohibition Yes Varies (sale focus)
Combination restriction Yes Less common
Certification Yes Some states

Building Multi-State Compliance

Unified Approach

Element Recommendation
Privacy policy Cover all applicable state requirements
Consumer rights Build process to handle all state rights
Contracts Include provisions satisfying all states
Opt-out Universal opt-out mechanism

State-Specific Requirements

State Specific Consideration
California "Do Not Sell or Share" link; GPC; SPI limitation link
Virginia Appeal process required
Colorado Universal opt-out mechanism recognition
Connecticut Appeal process required
Utah Simpler requirements; less sensitive data treatment

Prioritization Approach

Factor Consideration
Consumer base Focus on states with most consumers
Risk Private action states (California) first
Effective dates Address upcoming laws before effective
Enforcement activity Active enforcement states priority

Global Privacy Control Across States

For detailed GPC implementation guidance, see CCPA opt-out requirements.

State GPC Requirement
California Must honor as opt-out
Colorado Must honor universal opt-out
Connecticut Must honor universal opt-out
Texas Must honor universal opt-out
Montana Must honor universal opt-out
Oregon Must honor universal opt-out
Delaware Must honor universal opt-out

Implementing GPC compliance satisfies multiple state requirements.

Common Questions

Do I need separate privacy policies for each state?

No. A single comprehensive privacy policy can address all state requirements. Include state-specific sections or disclosures as needed.

If I comply with CCPA, am I compliant with other states?

CCPA compliance provides a strong foundation but is not sufficient alone. Key gaps:

  • Sensitive data opt-in (Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, Texas)
  • Appeal rights (Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut)
  • State-specific disclosures
  • Universal opt-out requirements

Which states should I prioritize?

Consider:

  1. California (largest population, private right of action)
  2. Texas (large population, recent law)
  3. States where you have significant customers
  4. States with active enforcement

Will there be a federal privacy law?

Federal privacy legislation has been proposed but not enacted. State laws remain the primary privacy framework in the US. A federal law could preempt some state requirements, but until then, multi-state compliance is necessary.

Compliance Checklist for Multi-State

Foundation (CCPA-Based)

Use the CCPA compliance checklist as your starting point.

  • Comprehensive privacy policy
  • Consumer rights request process
  • "Do Not Sell or Share" opt-out mechanism
  • GPC signal detection and honoring
  • Service provider contracts with privacy terms
  • Data inventory and mapping

State-Specific Additions

  • Sensitive data opt-in consent (VA, CO, CT, TX)
  • Appeal process (VA, CO, CT)
  • Universal opt-out recognition (CO, CT, TX, MT, OR, DE)
  • State-specific disclosures
  • Monitor new state laws for applicability

How Bastion Helps

Multi-state privacy compliance requires systematic approach and ongoing monitoring.

Challenge How We Help
Applicability assessment Determine which state laws apply
Gap analysis Compare current program to multi-state requirements
Policy harmonization Unified privacy notices meeting all requirements
Process design Consumer rights processes for all states
Monitoring Track new laws and regulatory developments
Contract updates Multi-state compliant vendor agreements

Need help with multi-state privacy compliance? Talk to our team →


Sources